http://www.pucl.org/Topics/Dalit-tribal/2004/santagarh.htm
PUCL,
January 2004
Two Dalit youth killed for winning
cricket matches
Killing of two Dalits at village
Santagarh district Saharanpur (Uttar Pradesh)
A PUCL Delhi report by Shri Pushkar Raj
and Shri Vidya Bhushan Rawat.
Two young dalits were killed by some upper caste Rajputs charging them of theft in a village near Saharanpur.
A local social worker Shri Ram Kumar requested PUCL to investigate the matter. The General Secretary of PUCL, Dr. Y. P. Chhibbar deputed two member team comprising Shri Pushkar Raj, General Secretary of PUCL-Delhi and Shri Vidya Bhushan Rawat, an executive member of PUCL-Delhi to conduct a fact finding investigation on the incident.
The team after visiting the village of incident and talking to the all concerned submitted the report which is produced below.
The
place of incident
The matter pertains to a village Santagarh which is about four
kilometers from the district head quarter of Saharanpur, a sugar cane
and mango growing prosperous region of western Uttar Pradesh.
The village falls in Harora constituency of the state legislature from
where last time Mayawati had won an impressive victory. The village is
mainly inhabited by scheduled castes (SC) and as we were told has 600
votes. Hasanpur is the adjoining village with 2600 voters, with mixed
population, majority of them Rajputs.
Young men from both villagers indulge in friendly cricket matches with
a few hundred rupees at stake. But at times the scene gets ugly if
lower caste village (Santagarh’s) boys win. In the last three cricket
matches Santagarh trounced Hasanpur. During the last match there were
heated arguments, scuffles broke out and there were minor injuries on
both sides. Injuries healed but grudges survived.
The
incident
Day: 21 December, Sunday. Time 10:30. Place: villager
cricket playground. Vikas son of Man Singh aged 21, who worked at local
brick kiln to support the family was playing cricket along with other
boys of village. He was batting with all the supporting gears, pad and
guard. Munish son of Vikram Singh, aged 20, who worked as a carpenter,
a piece of sugar cane in his hand, was on his way to join them.
According to the village eye witness four men on motor cycles arrived
on the scene. Two of them are identified as Karam Singh and Karan
Singh, both from village Hasanpur. “Village Pradhan (headman) is
calling you”, they are reported to have told Vikas. He wanted to talk
about a theft of a motor pump from one of the caller’s farm. Suspecting
nothing untoward he accompanied them. At the same time Munish was also
asked to accompany them. Rest of the boys kept playing cricket,
expecting that the two would join them soon.
Time: 2:30 afternoon. A boy comes running to the house
of Vikas. His father, a diminutive figure of sixty is told that his son
is killed by Rajputs and police have taken his body to hospital. He
runs to the hospital and is told that his son is dead. He is not shown
the dead body. He is told it has been taken for postmortem. Munish’s
father, around fifty and a patient of tuberculosis for the last five
years was luckier. When he reached the hospital his son was counting
his last breaths. He died in his lap.
Victims’
relatives’ version
The illiterate parents of the victims denied that there was any past
enmity of the boys with any body. According to them they have failed to
understand as to why their innocent sons were killed. The fact of the
loss of their son is slowly sinking, as one of the parents show you the
photograph of the victim. Vikas’s father told us that he had tied the
tent in the morning and had gone to play cricket as he was fond of the
game. As they were blissfully unaware at home like any other day they
seemed to have picked up pieces of information from the villagers who
were on or around the scene of the crime.
The father of Vikas had visited the hospital and had seen his son die
before his eyes, alleged that there were beating and torture marks all
over the body of his son. He said that his neck was almost broken.
They however alleged that there is a connivance of the village Pradhan
in the matter whose house probably was used in killing the two victims.
They felt agitated by the fact that though all the political parties
have made a big issue out of it they have failed to impress upon the
police to ensure that the four other alleged culprits are quickly
identified and arrested. They hoped and begged for the justice by
ensuring that the guilty are brought to the book at the earliest. Both
the parents however expressed skepticism whether that would happen!
Villager’s
version
The villagers said that there had been theft of motor pump from the
farms of one of the alleged culprits. The motor was traced at the shop
of a Kabadi (junk dealer) named Telu of Paragpur. The alleged culprits
probably suspected the victims and decided to teach them a lesson in
their own brutal way.
Some villagers who requested not to be named said that the alleged
perpetrators of the crime were men with criminal backgrounds. They are
alleged to have committed grave crimes including murder in not too
distant past and had got away with it because of their political
influence and contacts in police. Two ministers of the present
government are said to have taken keen interest in shielding them in
the present case.
According to the villagers the victims were killed by placing their
neck on the center of tractor hydraulic (the rear part of tractor under
which ploughing iron rods are fitted) placing a lathi on upper part of
it (neck) and putting pressure on either side of it, thereby damaging
the wind pipe. This was borne out by the testimony of one of victim’s
(Vikas ) father who had visited the hospital immediately after the
incident.
The villagers also held the view that it was a way to put dalits in the
state of fear, intimidation and subjugation once again as Mayawati’s
government had been replaced by a government that has a considerable
Rajput influence. They think that those dalits who felt adequately
secured and empowered are being reverted back to their previous state
by acts of brutal intimidation and violence.
Village
Pradhan’s version
Village Pradhan said that he has been unwell since 12 Dec 2003. He
produced a medical certificate for us to see. He said that he has been
advised complete bed rest since then. He denied that he called anybody
and sent anyone for the victim. He further denied that his gher (where
cattle are tied and kept) was used for beating, torturing or killing
the victims. He said that the issue has snowballed because of the
politicians.
The Pradhan alleged that the police have arrested wrong men. The
arrested man, Karam Singh, is not son of Charan Singh as mentioned in
the FIR. He is son of Jagat singh. The other person Karan Singh’s
father’s name is not at all mentioned in the FIR. What if there are
three persons whose name is Karan Singh in the village?
He further said that it was an act of violence by the mob. “How can you
identify people in a mob”, he asked. But he was unable to explain as to
why a mob would kill two young innocent boys who neither had any
criminal record nor any enmity with any body. Further he was hard
pressed to explain the fact of four men coming on motor cycles and
taking the boys away in front of many people on the pretext that the
Pradhan was calling them and at the same time talking about mob
violence.
On being asked about the other four people mentioned in FIR, the
village Pradhan said that as the named persons are innocent and have
been arrested, the police in order to make up the number would one day
arrest four more innocent persons.
Police
version
The police denied that there had been any report filed with them
regarding the theft of the motor pump. However they did not deny that
the matter could be linked to it.
When we approached District Superintendent of Police Jitender Sonekar
(himself a dalit), he maintained that the case is politically sensitive
and therefore it has been handed over to CBCID. He advised us to
contact Lucknow headquarter.
On being asked about the anomaly in FIR on which the entire case would
be based he denied that any impropriety had been committed on the part
of lower staff as the FIR has been registered by the near relatives of
the victim.
Regarding, yet to be arrested four persons, he maintained that it was
difficult to identify people when the mob is involved.
Conclusion
The local powerful (dominant caste and rich) have no faith in the rule
of law. They prefer dispensing justice by themselves rather than go to
the police/ state.
The incident is the result of a well planned scheme to murder and not
an act of mob violence as some are trying to make it.
The reasons behind the act were many, some accumulated and some
immediate:
The immediate provocation seems to be the theft of the motor pump and
suspected link of the victim with the same. A week back the alleged
culprit’s motor (with which under ground water is drawn at farm land)
was stolen from his farm. He is said to have made private investigation
and traced the motor to a Kabadi of Paragpur, a nearby village. The
Kabadi is said to have named the victims as thieves. There was no
evidence to this affect against the victim and neither a report was
registered with the police. Rajputs used the alibi of theft of motor
pump, to teach the dalits of Santagarh a lesson.
The main cause seems to be the defeat in successive cricket matches
that was considered an insult to Rajputs who considered themselves
invincible and the least to be beaten by the `subjugated and good for
nothing’ dalits.
The
profile of victims: They were the good players. They were vocal
and upright. On earlier occasion expressed their political empowerment
(during Mayawati’s regime) on winning cricket match in no uncertain
terms.
The culprits were sure that they would go scot-free as they chose broad
light without fear. They felt somewhat emboldened by the fact that they
have a Rajput friendly government in Lucknow. The impact of Lucknow
regime is more than evident in structure and functioning and general
behaviour of the local bureaucracy. Village Pradhan is said to be a
relative of one of the minister in UP government.
The connivance of police with the alleged culprits is quite clear. It
is borne out from the wrong names that were mentioned in FIR. In
essence the FIR is totally fabricated.
Police has been abysmally slow in investigating the case. It is evident
from the fact that four other men mentioned in FIR are yet to be
identified and arrested.
Recommendations
The FIR must be changed. For one it should be registered under section
302 instead of existing 147, 148 and 304. Secondly the names of the
alleged perpetrators of the crime should be correctly mentioned.
Otherwise the case will be too week to stand the trial.
The case should be handed over to CBI. The local police have proved
incompetent. The move to handover to CBCID is to bury it indefinitely.
The erring police men in this regard (tampering with the FIR) must be
brought to book. A departmental inquiry should be initiated against
them.
The compensation given to the families of the victims’ is abysmally
low. No amount is adequate to compensate the parents of the victim for
the loss of their dear ones. Still mere Rs. 1.5 lakh cannot be said to
be adequate for emotional and economic loss of the two families. At
least a compensation of Rs. 5 lakh must be given to the victims’
families.
The case must proceed with alacrity so that the people’s faith in the
law is not shaken.
http://www.outlookindia.com/fullprint.asp?choice=1&fodname=20040223&fname=Cricket+%28F%29&sid=1
Magazine| Feb 23, 2004
![]()
spotlight
![]()
On Bloody
Pavilions
![]()
Dalit youths
in this UP village win a game of cricket but lose lives in the caste war
![]()
ANUPREETA DAS
| Sport is infamous
for spawning rivalries. But amidst the yellow mustard fields in this
tiny swathe of western Uttar Pradesh, an innocent game of cricket has
turned into an ugly caste battle, with horrific consequences. Barely
two months ago, two Dalit youths from Santagarh—a small village near
the sprawling town of Saharanpur—were brutally mangled to death in
broad daylight by their upper-caste neighbours from Hasanpur village.
Their only crime—if victory can be called a crime—was that in
'friendly' cricket matches played between the village teams, Santagarh
regularly trounced Hasanpur. "The cricket team from Hasanpur, made up mostly of Rajputs, seems to have taken the defeats as an insult to their pride and honour. They considered themselves invincible and couldn't stomach being defeated by Dalits," says Pushkar Raj of the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). Last week, the PUCL published a report on the gruesome incident, detailing how the murders happened. Young men from the two villages regularly played cricket on weekends. These matches were played in a nearby maidan for a small prize money of Rs 300 for the winning team. Santagarh's population is entirely scheduled caste, while Hasanpur has a mixed population. Although the Rajputs are a minority in Hasanpur, they control most of the village's social and economic affairs. The cricket team too was an upper-caste fief, but they had been playing against the Dalit team for several years without any serious confrontation off the field. Cricket enthusiasts from nearby villages who watched these one-day matches claim that before the murders put an end to inter-village cricket, the Santagarh team had defeated the boys from Hasanpur in three consecutive matches. "The boys from Santagarh had been winning Rs 200-300 from Hasanpur for every match they won," informs Deepak Kumar of Paragpur, a nearby village. "They were a good team, they always scored many runs," he adds. The recent spate of Santagarh wins had led to bad blood between the two sides. A few matches ended in heated arguments and fisticuffs. But while the injuries healed, grudges continued to fester. "The teams had begun fighting frequently over winning and losing in the cricket matches, but otherwise there was no enmity," says a weeping Chandro, whose 21-year-old son Munish was one of the youths killed. Munish was the Santagarh team's star batsman, and had learnt his cricketing moves from watching grainy televised matches on the family's small black-and-white TV set. On that fateful morning, Munish was picked up by a group of men on his way to the cricket grounds where a match between Santagarh and Hasanpur had just begun. Meanwhile, his teammate, 20-year-old Vikas, who was keeping wickets for the match, was asked to come off the field as he was being summoned by the village pradhan. The other boys continued to play. "That day, the prize money was Rs 200," says Wajid, a cricket enthusiast from Paragpur. The two youths, Vikas and Munish, were then allegedly placed under the rear of a tractor, where a hydraulic pump fitted with iron rods was used to break their windpipes. "When I went to the hospital, I couldn't recognise my own son," recalls Vikas' father, Man Singh. Though illiterate, Vikas, a casual labourer, was the family's only source of income as Man Singh suffers from chronic tuberculosis. However, the Rajputs of Hasanpur deny that cricket played any role in the killings. In fact, they refuse to acknowledge that Hasanpur even has a cricket team. "If teenagers play cricket with each other, that doesn't make them a team," insists Jayaprakash Rana, the pradhan of Hasanpur. When one of his servants, a Dalit boy, is about to offer information, Rana quells him with a piercing stare. In Rana's version, the two Santagarh youths were caught stealing a motor pump from the fields of a Hasanpur farmer, Karan Singh, on the day they were murdered. "They had begun dismantling the pump the night before, and were caught carrying a part of it," he claims. Karan Singh's son, Dabboo, carries the story forward: "When my father shouted in anger, a mob gathered and decided to mete out justice to the thieves. How can you penalise a mob?" Another villager, who refused to be named because he works for the UP government, claims that "Santagarhis are habitual thieves". "They have a history of looting and plundering," he insists. The victims' families lodged an fir with the police station in Gaggalahedi claiming that rivalry over cricket led to the murders. In a counter-fir filed by Karan Singh's family, the allegation is theft. The sho, Aadil Rashid, too maintains it was an "angry mob" that attacked the duo after they were caught "red-handed". Strangely enough, Vikas was brought to the hospital in Saharanpur where he breathed his last with his cricketing gear still on. A moot question: why would anyone be carrying out a theft dressed in cricket pads? "They can slap any allegation on our son, now that he is dead. He can hardly defend himself now," says Man Singh. Ram Kumar, a Saharanpur-based social worker who first informed the PUCL about the incident, says the two victims were outspoken youths, who on occasion had informally campaigned for Dalit rights in the villages. "The killings were meant to send a message about who's king of these villages," he says. Although the area, which falls under the Harora assembly constituency, was traditionally a bsp stronghold—with Mayawati herself having contested and won from here twice—the bsp lost to the Samajwadi Party in the December 2003 byelection. "The immediate provocation may have been cricket, but one can only make sense of the killings against the broader political context," says Kumar. He maintains that the killings were brutal acts of intimidation, designed by those with political protection to "put the Dalits in their place". For the time being, the message seems to have hit home. In Santagarh, the barbaric acts have cast a deathly pall on the village team's enthusiasm for cricket. The members of the erstwhile Santagarh team are unwilling to talk, or even come forth. "Everyone is scared that they will meet a similar fate if they talk about what happened," says Meghraj, who was present at the scene of the crime. "All competitive matches have been stopped since Vikas and Munish were killed," says Wajid. The case has now been transferred to the Lucknow branch of the CB-CID, given its politically sensitive overtones. But while justice takes its unhurried course, the skin of fear surrounding Santagarh only grows thicker. "Forget playing cricket, no one from our village even ventures in the direction of Hasanpur anymore," says Munish's father Vikram Singh. A second innings of this deadly caste game could crush their spirit forever. |